Difference between revisions of "Permittivity and Permeability of Materials Obstacle Course"

From Advanced Projects Lab
Jump to: navigation, search
(Permittivity of a Lossless Material From a Capacitance Measurement)
(Activities)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
[[File:Epsiloncap1.png |right |350px]]
 
[[File:Epsiloncap1.png |right |350px]]
  
# Place three samples (air, Teflon, glass) between the aligned and polished ends of two 3/8" diameter, 1/2" lengths of 6061 Al rods (as shown at right). <math>d</math> should be on the order of 1 mm. Measure the capacitances and, from the known surface area <math>A</math> and spacing <math>d</math>, determine the material's relative permittivity.  <math>C = \epsilon_r \epsilon_0 \frac{A}{d}</math>.
+
# Place three samples (air, Teflon, glass) between the aligned and polished ends of two 3/8" diameter, 1/2" lengths of 6061 Al rods (as shown at right). <math>d</math> should be on the order of 1 mm. Measure the capacitances and, from the known surface area <math>A</math> and spacing <math>d</math>, determine the material's relative permittivity.  <math>C = \epsilon_r \epsilon_0 \frac{A}{d}</math> (for a capacitor with no fringing fields).
 
# How do your measured permittivity values compare to standard reference values?
 
# How do your measured permittivity values compare to standard reference values?
 +
# [https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/charges-and-fields/latest/charges-and-fields_en.html Use this web applet to build a capacitor and observe the field lines ]. Are there fringing fields?
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(air): 1.000536<br>
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(air): 1.000536<br>
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(Teflon): 2.1<br>
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(Teflon): 2.1<br>
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(glass): 3.7-10<br>
 
<math>\epsilon_r</math>(glass): 3.7-10<br>
 +
 +
=== A Better Permittivity-Capacitance Measurement of a lossless Material ===
 +
 +
[[File:Epsiloncap2.png |right |350px]]
 +
# [https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/html/charges-and-fields/latest/charges-and-fields_en.html Use this web applet to build a ''guarded-electrode'' capacitor (as shown at the right) and observe the field lines ]. Are there fringing fields?
 +
# Measure the three permittivities (air, Teflon, glass) again using this guarded-electrode setup.
 +
# How do these results compare to your first (unguarded) measurements?
 +
# How do these results compare to the standard values?

Revision as of 13:34, 16 May 2018

PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION


Permanent Materials

- 6061 3/8" Al rod stock
- Teflon
- Glass microscope slide
- HP Signal Generator (DC-1 GHz)
- Oscilloscope (at least 1GHz bandwidth)
- Miscellaneous electrical components

Materials to Borrow When Necessary

- Milling machine
- Lathe

Activities

Reading

  1. Read the Wikipedia articles on permittivity and permeability. With the help of the instructor or TA try to achieve a physical understanding of just what the permittivity and permeability mean in a bulk material.
  2. Read the first three sections of this paper (pages 1-27). Pay particular attention to the permittivity () / capacitance and permeability () / inductance associations.

Permittivity of a Lossless Material From a Capacitance Measurement

Epsiloncap1.png
  1. Place three samples (air, Teflon, glass) between the aligned and polished ends of two 3/8" diameter, 1/2" lengths of 6061 Al rods (as shown at right). should be on the order of 1 mm. Measure the capacitances and, from the known surface area and spacing , determine the material's relative permittivity. (for a capacitor with no fringing fields).
  2. How do your measured permittivity values compare to standard reference values?
  3. Use this web applet to build a capacitor and observe the field lines . Are there fringing fields?

(air): 1.000536
(Teflon): 2.1
(glass): 3.7-10

A Better Permittivity-Capacitance Measurement of a lossless Material

Epsiloncap2.png
  1. Use this web applet to build a guarded-electrode capacitor (as shown at the right) and observe the field lines . Are there fringing fields?
  2. Measure the three permittivities (air, Teflon, glass) again using this guarded-electrode setup.
  3. How do these results compare to your first (unguarded) measurements?
  4. How do these results compare to the standard values?